科学驱动视角下产业创新网络与生态主体研究——以5G产业为例
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.电子科技大学;2.清华大学;3.贵州财经大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

G301; F403.6

基金项目:

科学驱动的产业创新:理论、案例与政策(L2124026)


Research on innovation network and ecological subject of industries from the science-driven perspective:Take 5G industry as an example
Author:
Affiliation:

1.University of Electronic Science and Technology of China;2.Tsinghua University;3.GuiZhou University of Finance and Economics

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    本研究利用产业科学关联度指标清晰界定科学驱动的产业与创新,通过社会网络分析方法探究其在整个产业中的网络地位及其作用,并挖掘产业创新生态参与主体的网络关系。研究发现:科学驱动的创新成果处于网络中心位置,更容易被频繁的引用,能够为其他创新成果提供经验输出和知识依赖,成为驱动创新发展的基石,同时科学驱动的创新成果审查周期和技术覆盖广度在数值上显著的大于“技术驱动的创新”,表明其能够产生高价值技术的可能性更大;科学驱动的产业是科学驱动的创新大量汇聚的产业,是整个行业发展的关键核心技术,具备取得、协调以及配置资源的能力,能够整合内外部信息和知识资源,通过频繁的交流、协作带动其他产业的共同发展,为产业的形成演化奠定基础;在科学驱动的产业中,创新主体之间网络结构紧密,产学研协同融合体系发挥重要作用,企业占据主体地位成为创新的主体和参与科学研究的主体,而大学等公共机构的创新成果传播速度更快,在创新网络中的中心性地位具有不可替代的优势。

    Abstract:

    Science-driven industry and innovation was defined with the industrial-science correlation method, used social network analysis to explore the network status and role of science-driven industry and innovation in the entire industry, and analyzed the participants’ network relationship of industrial innovation ecology. The results show that science-driven innovation achievements are at the center of the network, which can provide experience output and knowledge dependence for other innovation achievements, and become the cornerstone of innovation-driven development. At the same time, the examination cycle of science-driven innovation achievements should be significantly longer than "technology-driven innovation", the technology coverage is significantly wider than "technology-driven innovation", and science-driven innovation can improve the possibility of high-value technology breakthrough; Science-driven industries are the industries where a large number of science-driven innovations converge. They are the key technologies for the development of the entire industry. They have the ability to obtain, coordinate and allocate resources, integrate internal and external information and knowledge resources, drive the common development of other industries through frequent exchanges and cooperation, and lay the foundation for the formation and evolution of the industry; The network structure between innovation subjects is tight. The IUR cooperation system plays an important role in the science-driven industry. Enterprises occupy the dominant position as the main subject of innovation and participate in scientific research, while public institutions such as universities have faster dissemination of innovation results, and their central position in the innovation network has irreplaceable advantages.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

朱卫杰,韩武成,鲁若愚,雷家骕,李天柱.科学驱动视角下产业创新网络与生态主体研究——以5G产业为例[J].技术经济,2023,42(6):1-12.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-14
  • 最后修改日期:2023-06-06
  • 录用日期:2023-05-06
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-06-26
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第 位访问者
电话:010-65055536, 18515632865  Email:jishujingji@cste.org.cn
地址:北京市海淀区学院南路86号(100081)  邮政编码:80-584
ICP:京ICP备05035734号-5
技术经济 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
×
《技术经济》
“数字经济驱动高质量发展:融合、创新与共享”专题征稿启事