碳减排“双试点”政策能否发挥“减污降碳试验田”效能
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.新疆大学 新疆创新管理研究中心;2.同济大学环境科学与工程学院、新疆大学经济与管理学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F204;X321

基金项目:

自治区重点研发计划项目“能源领域碳排放和碳汇测算方法、评估标准及指标体系研发”(2022B01010-1);国家社会科学基金重大项目“碳中和目标驱动下多能互补体系的协同机理与实现路径研究”(21 ZD133);国家自然科学基金地区“新疆资源型产业污染集聚、损益偏离与包容性绿色增长”(71963030);科技部重大科技项目暨第三次新疆综合科学考察课题级项目“吐哈盆地国家能源基地建设调查与碳减排潜力评估”(SQ2021xjkk01800-5);新疆大学2024年优秀博士研究生创新项目“碳交易政策对绿色低碳转型的影响机理研究”(XJU2024BS021)


her the Carbon Emissions Reduction Policy “Double pilot” can Exert the Effectiveness of the “Experimental Fields for Reducing Pollution and Carbon Emissions”
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Xinjiang Innovation Management Research Center, Xinjiang University;2.School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University;3.College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    碳交易政策和低碳城市政策作为两项典型的碳减排试点政策,对减污降碳是否具有政策叠加效应?本文基于2006—2020年中国279个地级市面板数据,运用多期双重差分模型,从政策协同、目标协同的视角探究碳减排政策对城市减污降碳的影响。结果表明:(1)碳减排“双试点”政策对减污降碳具有明显的协同效应,政策实施时间越长,减排效应越强。(2)“双试点”政策通过促进绿色技术创新和优化能源消费结构发挥减污降碳效应。(3)西部地区、非资源型城市、非老工业基地和发达城市实施“双试点”政策,减污降碳效果更好。(4)两个“单试点”政策都能促进减污降碳,二者相比,碳交易政策的碳减排效应更优,低碳城市试点政策的减污效应更优。“双试点”比“单试点”政策对减污降碳更有效,先成为低碳城市试点再实施碳交易政策的“双试点”城市减污降碳效果更明显。该研究为碳减排政策的实施提供参考。

    Abstract:

    Do the carbon trading policy and low-carbon city policy, as two typical carbon emissions reduction pilot policies, have a policy overlay effect on reducing pollution and carbon emissions? The multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) model was used to explore the policy effect of carbon emissions reduction policies on reducing pollution and carbon emissions from the perspectives of policy synergies and target synergies, basing on the panel data of 279 cities in China from 2006 to 2020. The results show that: (1) The dual pilot policy has an obvious synergistic effect on reducing pollution and carbon emissions. The longer the policy is implemented, the stronger the emissions reduction effect is. (2) The dual pilot policy reduces pollution and carbon emissions by optimizing energy consumption structure and promoting green technology innovation. (3) The implementation of dual pilot policy in western regions, non-resource-based cities, non-old industrial bases and developed cities has achieved better effect on reducing pollution and carbon emissions. (4) Both single pilot policies can promote to reduce pollution and carbon emissions. Comparison between two policies, the carbon trading policy play better effect on carbon emissions reduction, and the low carbon city pilot policy play better effect on pollution reduction .The double pilot policy is more effective than the single pilot policy in reducing pollution and carbon. The double pilot city that first becomes the low carbon city pilot and then implements the carbon trading policy has stronger effect on reducing pollution and carbon. This study provides a reference for implementing carbon emissions reduction policies.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王娇,孙慧,廖振良,杨伟艺.碳减排“双试点”政策能否发挥“减污降碳试验田”效能[J].技术经济,2024,43(10):124-139.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-17
  • 最后修改日期:2024-10-16
  • 录用日期:2024-05-11
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-11-05
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第 位访问者
电话:010-65055536, 18515632865  Email:jishujingji@cste.org.cn
地址:北京市海淀区学院南路86号(100081)  邮政编码:80-584
ICP:京ICP备05035734号-5
技术经济 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
×
《技术经济》
“数字经济驱动高质量发展:融合、创新与共享”专题征稿启事