• 网站首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 投稿须知
  • 绘图要求
  • 期刊订阅
  • 联系我们
  • English

用户登录

  • 作者登录
  • 审稿登录
  • 编辑登录
  • 读者登录

在线期刊

  • 当期目次

  • 过刊浏览

  • Email Alert

  • RSS

  • 文章点击排行

  • 文章下载排行

下载专区

  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊列表(2021—2022年度)

  • 2018年中国科技核心期刊目录(自然科学卷)

  • 标点符号用法

  • 《地球环境学报》绘图要求

  • 《地球环境学报》征稿简则

  • 2017年中国科技核心期刊目录(自然科学卷)

  • 2016年中国科技核心期刊目录 (自然科学卷)

  • 国标文献著录格式

友情链接

  • 中国科学院
  • 国家自然科学基金委员会
  • 中华人民共和国科学技术部
  • 中国科学院地球环境研究所
  • 中国科学院地球环境研究所...
引用本文:魏晓旭,颜长珍.2019.生态承载力评价方法研究进展[J].地球环境学报,10(5):441-452
WEI Xiaoxu, YAN Changzhen.2019.Research and model application in ecological carrying capacity[J].Journal of Earth Environment,10(5):441-452
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   【查看/发表评论】  【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 4677次   下载 2492次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
生态承载力评价方法研究进展
魏晓旭,颜长珍
1. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院,兰州 730000 2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
摘要:
生态承载力是当前生态学、地理学、经济学等领域的研究热点,生态承载力评价方法的研究对于区域社会经济协调可持续发展具有重要的意义。在详细阐述生态承载力概念、内涵、国内主要研究领域、研究机构的基础上,重点分析比较了目前生态承载力所涉及的研究方法,并比较了不同模型之间的优缺点,最后分析总结了目前生态承载力研究存在的不足和未来需要加强的领域和方向。从方法上来看,目前所用方法主要有:(1)指标体系综合评价法;(2)产品周期综合评价法;(3)结合不同学科和不同方法的综合评价法。目前生态承载力的研究缺乏科学完整的研究体系,尚未构建具有普适性的评价指标体系,演化趋势与模拟预测研究不足,格局分异研究较少,未来应该在以下几个方面深入研究:(1)加强生态承载力模型集成研究。由于生态承载力问题十分复杂,涉及资源、环境、生态、社会、经济等诸多要素,因此需要综合各个要素之间的相互关系及影响机制,进行不同模型集成和综合研究;(2)应从影响生态承载力的主动与被动因子,动态与静态因子出发,构建综合性和普适性较强的评价体系;(3)加强生态承载力的动态模拟研究,实现对生态承载力潜力的估算和动态变化过程的监测;(4)研究不同尺度下生态承载力时空变化特征及空间分异,并对比分析各模型对不同尺度的精度要求和结果的可靠性。
关键词:  生态承载力  评价方法  可持续发展  研究进展
DOI:10.7515/JEE181009
CSTR:32259.14.JEE181009
分类号:
基金项目:国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0500201);国家自然科学基金项目(41730752)
英文基金项目:National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0500201); National Natural Science Foundation of China (41730752)
Research and model application in ecological carrying capacity
WEI Xiaoxu, YAN Changzhen
1. Key Laboratory of Desert and Desertification, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Abstract:
Background, aim, and scope Ecological carrying capacity (ECC) is a research frontier in the domain of ecology, geography and economics, which is of great significance for the coordinated and sustainable development of local social economy. The concept of carrying capacity can be dated back to the 1920s, which is used to describe the limitation of natural resources and environment and its influence in the development of human society. Since 1990s, with the continuous expansion of the application scope on carrying capacity, and the concept of ecological carrying capacity has been derived. In this study, we aim to put forward the fields and directions of ecological carrying capacity that need to be strengthened in the future through comparing the models and methods and analyzing existing problem. Materials and methods The conception of ecological carrying capacity, connotation, research field, research institutions were analyzed, and various research methods, advantages and disadvantages of models were also analyzed and compared on the basis of comparative analysis the different models. Last, the deficiencies of current research of ecological carrying capacity and the research direction in the future were summarized. Results Seen from the perspective methods, it mainly includes: (1) comprehensive evaluation indicator system; (2) product cycle comprehensive evaluation method; (3) comprehensive evaluation method combining different disciplines and methods. Discussion There is a lack of scientific and complete research system, a universal evaluation index system has not been built and the evolution trend and simulation research are scarce. Conclusions The research on ecological carrying capacity should be lucubrated as follows: (1) to strengthen the integration research on ecological carrying capacity model. Ecological carrying capacity is very complex field, involving resources, environment, ecology, society, economy and many other discipline, it is necessary to integrate the mutual relations and influence mechanism among various elements, and conduct different model integration and comprehensive research. (2) establish the comprehensive indicator system, including five major categories of indicators: population, economy, resources, environment and ecology. Start from the active factor, passive factor, dynamic factor and static factor, and build a comprehensive and relatively universal evaluation system; (3) strengthen the dynamic simulation research, and realize the estimation of ecological carrying capacity potential and the prediction of dynamic change process; (4) study the spatial and temporal variation characteristics and spatial differentiation of ecological carrying capacity at different scales, and analyze the accuracy requirements of each model at different scales and the reliability of the results. Recommendations and perspectives The studies on research and model application in ecological carrying capacity have made a great progress and achievements. However, there are still some shortages concerning scientific and complete research system, universal evaluation index system, and the evolution trend and simulation research which have not been addressed and investigated further. As mentioned above problems, we suggested research directions that we need to do in future works.
Key words:  ecological carrying capacity  assessment methods  sustainable development  research progress
您是本站第  访问者
版权所有:《地球环境学报》编辑部 陕ICP备11001760号-3
主办:中国科学院地球环境研究所 地址:西安市雁塔区雁翔路97号 邮政编码:710061
电话:029-62336252 电子邮箱:jee@ieecas.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司